{"id":1480,"date":"2024-04-16T00:42:10","date_gmt":"2024-04-15T23:42:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/netresultsgroup.com\/?p=1480"},"modified":"2024-04-19T19:46:48","modified_gmt":"2024-04-19T18:46:48","slug":"who-owns-the-spare-parts-strategy-at-your-company","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/netresultsgroup.com\/who-owns-the-spare-parts-strategy-at-your-company\/","title":{"rendered":"Who owns the spare parts strategy at your company?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Spare parts cost companies millions of dollars each year. In truth, this multimillion-dollar section of the balance sheet is often overlooked. Companies may avoid strategies to improve their MRO spare parts materials because they may not be as \u201csexy\u201d as strategies for finished goods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because of this, companies are severely overinvested in spare parts. Failure to realize their strategic importance leads firms to experience incorrect inventory levels and inflated annual spend, directly impacting working capital and profitability as well as operational performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s important to recognize that companies experience a higher and more immediate hard dollar return from implementing MRO strategies, whereas results from MRO strategic initiatives go directly to the bottom line.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"MRO<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

The question becomes, \u201cWho owns this strategy and who in the organization should be held accountable for making it happen?\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

As many company leaders discover, various audit points have exposed MRO material issues throughout the enterprise, creating a very large pain point especially for the CFO and Plant Controllers. Lack of any strategy leads to Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) exposure, significant expenditure in avoidable costs, and reduced operational efficiencies:<\/p>\n\n\n\n